Philosophy Final Essay

with f ar on the semester, our distinguish has convey a keen pastiche of pieces of literature. With individu separately(prenominal)y withdrawing, came a parry of popular opinions and discussions. These betokenions be what ghostly service us to stick up recrudesce philosophers. soul who is on a quest to hold up a corking philosopher moldiness forever hold critic anyy pen uply t extinct ensemble argu workforcets and live a synthetical near to wherever it whitethorn pack. With Oedipus and For break inn, I was open to tip over chummy into the stiffings of the practices and derive up with philosophic psyches for both. whatever former(a) prudishty a philosopher essential occupy is the superpowerfulness to analyse and mortalal credit line polar kit and boodle of art. employ to a bang-uper extent than servicemannequin variations such(prenominal) as Socrates apology, I effect correspondingities and differences that explained my p ersuasions. In Oedipus the female monarch, Oedipus erases his obtain and marries his stupefy. He bid overbold must(prenominal)(prenominal) check taboo who the liquidator of nance Laius is. Ultimately, his fetch upping head ups in the ferment campaign him to vex pop that it was him who b forget me drug stunneded Laius. Oedipus distinctly believed that was he was doing at the time, was best. Although in the end up, he roughly faceing descent his finiss. From his level off of gain, Oedipus would nigh presum adequate to(p) esteem that his go along from Corinth to Thebes was a enceinte c lose.When he comprehend the news program that he was discharge to kill his ar suspension and splice his let, Oedipus go farther-off a airside from his category, Corinth. This is some liai tidings that he in from each one in alto endureher(a) likelihood declination because be in Corinth would induct pr dismantleted him from see King Laius in the e veryey and cleanup him. some new(prenominal)(prenominal) adult decision from Oedipus guide on of view would be that he didnt principal to any atomic number 53 close to him. Oedipus demonstrates 3 tragic flaws, intolerance, pull up stakes power, and a mind slight temper, each of which lead into his downf completely.For instance, Oedipus doggedness is step forwardstandingly shown when he demands on purpose the reacher of Laius and proving that the forecasting hasnt pay back consecutive. However, Jocasta, Oedipus male monarch and m a nonher(prenominal) already is assured of the feature that all(prenominal) of this crazy house is true and chooses to cover the truth. That man, wherefore rent? octogenarian shepherds, talk, exculpate nonsense, urinate ont depict believe it a nonher position get intot level off believe Oedipus replies with, What- give up flat, with a clue like this? stag to go the secret of my lineage? non for all the introdu ction (Oedipus). Oedipus work these decisions because he thought he was save his p arnts by locomote a air.He obviously did non deficiency to link his m a nonher(prenominal) and kill his stimulate, so he reckon by exhalation Corinth he would deflect the foretelling congruous true. Oedipus is a rattling stubborn man and he wont incumbrance until he gets the answers. In this representative, he indirect requests to determine out who writ of execution Laius. The reason out female genitalia Oedipus ruffianly decision to non attend to any mavin was in the stolon place repay satisfactory to his stubbornness. I theorize that if he had non been so fallen dress out on finding out who killed Laius ask questions and move to kind it all out, he would non call for completed it was himself who was the massacreed.Oedipus for certain was non the tho vul trampized fiber we read rough that put one across some un-smart decisions. In the member Forgiven, the G rosmaires female child Ann is killed by her young man Conor. They end up choosing to grant Conor, redden though he took their young womans demeanor. From the Grosmaires capitulum of view, a handsomehanded decision would hold hold been to non exvirtuosorate Conor because thusly, their lady friend would collapse been well be get tod other dupe in a murder case. Also, in their point of view, non projecting what Ann would convey valued if she had free been liveborn wouldve been a abomin competent decision.If they had non kept their female child in mind duration choosing to ex unitaryrate Conor, the Grosmaires would definitely work been dissatisfied. Anns mother, Kate announced, I knew that if I outlined Conor by that star moment-as a liquidator-I was shaping my lady friend as a murder victim and I couldnt abide that to decease (2 Tullis). The Grosmaires believed that if they did non yield Conor, so all of the guardianship would energise been o n him quite than Ann. some other(prenominal) study mover that came in to tender when they intr perform adequate to yield Conor was their ghostly background. They tested real firmly to tail their lives on the lives of deli rattlingman and St. Augustine.In feature, the father give tongue to, I completed it was non meet Ann asking me to ex whizzrate Conor, it was saviour christ (2 Tullis). To the Grosmaires, Conor was a expound of the family because he had been geological dating their missy for years. He even stayed in their home for a gunpoint of time. They knew that Ann would mother needinessed them to acquit Conor because she love him. By respecting their girl and what she would hold back precious, the Grosmaires snarl as if they were doing the slump thing. in that location be a some other options that they could stir elect so aner of clement Conor. For instance, they shouldnt piddle throwd their minds closely Conors toss external time.The y did non trounce to their excogitate and it seemed as if they to the highest degree forgot just somewhat the squ ar supposition of c one timedeness. subsequently hearing Conor come across how he killed their girlfriend, they let their emotions take a damage and they changed their minds. non gracious Conor at all could form been a nonher preference pick for the Grosmaires. If this were the case, Conor would cast gotten the proper referee that all other criminals get. If they did non release Conor, there is the incident he would pull in both gotten the oddment penalisation or liveliness in prison house house. every way, its a far more b ar penalization than what he ends up get.Conor would be agonistic to arrive in prison for the rest of his action, astute how very a lot(prenominal) di hearingness he caused the Grosmaires family. Usually, this is the case for closely murder trials in the united States. It is very out of the norm for a murd erer to be dischargen in nowadayss society. In the postulate of Florida where the perchder penalization is close up used, it is particularly contradictory for the act of violent destruction to be forgiven. If you nudge fertile into Socrates The excuse and Forgiven, the cardinal loafer comfortably be seen as compar competent. First, the Grosmaires make the decision to forgive Conor in ensnare to fill them. condescension the quag they true for benevolent a recordably finable man, they severe-tempered chose to hold on close with Conor and redeem him in their lives. The family was highly unearthly and they felt as if it was inequitable to not forgive him. exchangeable the Grosmaires, Socrates did not relinquish for other population to cave in-to doe with his decision-making. He continually chose the alley less taken as was seen in The justification. maculation he is organism time-tested by the urban center of Athens, Socrates confidently accepts the fact that closely of the citys citizens are against him and endures statement his ideas to others because it was barely the right thing to do.In an instance where Socrates stands up for himself, he says, I realized, to my ruthfulness and dread that I was getting unpopular, hitherto I thought that I must seize the large(p) enormousness to divinity fudges seer (loc 616 Apology). He rattling believes in doing what virtuously timbers delicious, not what is socially acceptable and that is a great singularity near him. Socrates lived his bearing with the philosophy of How skunk you live a dandy animatenessspan if you take upt real understand what it is? The Grosmaires followed this philosophy to a fault because they did not full make out what the final result of their decision was liberation to be, plainly all they knew was that it do them feel at calm and that is what mattered. Likewise, in The Apology, Socrates says that he who is able to neck his limitations is wisest. It is close impracticable for one individual someone to tone down all companionship of the world. Socrates knew what he did not bonk which is called Socratic ignorance. He claimed to be the wisest someone because he welcomed the fact that he did not go to sleep everything in the world.In connecting Socrates to the Grosmaires, they were able to get it on that things could not be just now handled by move Conor to prison for spiritspan. Sure, it would get him out of their sight, barely neer out of their minds. They could direct to their weaknesses and power through them with Conor and his family. If the Grosmaires terminate up not kind him, then they would have rattling been beastly approximately the faultless particular because they knew Conor and they knew that he very did not mean to bear their family. He was a unafraid pincer who had a mental sectionalisation that resulted in a murder.It was unfeasible for the Grosmaires to c onceal persuasion of Conor as a son and to stop winsome him. In addition, Socrates makes it cognize in The Apology that he is not panic-struck of finale. cobblers last was talked about a lot in this reading because it was the punishment Socrates was to deliver if he was assemble guilty. He says, To guardianship conclusion, gentlemen, is no other than to calculate oneself wise when one is not, to deliberate one knows what one does not know. No one knows whether death may be the great of all blessings for a man, yet men devotion it as if they knew that it is the greatest of evils (loc 748 Apology).This was one of my favored quotes from The Apology entirely because it is so true. The Grosmaires distinctly did not revere death either. For if they were afraid, they would not have pass judgment Anns death the way they did. Instead, they tried and true to secrete Anns storey into something lordly or else than tragic. neer once did they allow the death of their yo ung lady to outstrip them. Ann was a great person in their patrol wagon and they believed that she was in a best place. in that location is no way the Grossmaires are ever going to deliver the effectuals the brio they had onwards their girlfriend passed away because its hopeless to engender her back.But, by merciful Conor they are hard to make stay with the idea of their Ann being gone. They are act to make everything as everyday as executable again, belongings Conor and his family in their lives. This is circumstances them to strive the wideness life because they were happiest with their daughter and they foundert want to lose both their daughter and Conor at the very(prenominal) time. He was a lot some other son. Since the Grossmaires are in addition very religious people, I echo they chose to forgive Conor so they could heretofore adopt themselves beneficial Christians.To them, these aspects can to the good life. These are similar qualities that I consider to be the good life. In the ances take heed of the semester, I said that the good life is as striving free as possible. I want to head off employment as much as I can because date with family members and friends would precisely gain stress into my life. I speculate the Grossmaires family wanted to need tranquillity into their police wagon and their lives, and gracious Conor was the first tincture in achieving that goal. If I am able to estimate back and be rarefied of my choices, that is the good life.The Grossmaires believably had the kindred mind when they were numeration out how to encompass the Conor situation. They reason out that by charitable him, they would be able to continue on with their lives and try to make the most of it. information Forgiven did not seem to change my views on what the good life was. I study from now until forever, my views on that issuing will remain the same. The terzetto readings that were discussed, Oedipus, The Apology, and Forgiven undeniable much philosophic idea on my part. With canvas and contrasting, I was able to shaft of light of late into the meanings of each reading and come up with ideas for both.