Why the Death Penalty Should Be Terminated Essay -- The Case Against C

demolition is a unique penalization in the United States. In a society that so strongly affirms the sanctity of life, non surprisingly the green view is that death is the ultimate sanction... There has been no national contention about punishment in general or by imprisonment, alike(p) to the debate about the punishment of death (Brennan). Indeed, the issue of capital punishment is one that has been widely debated and for which many persuasive arguments of distinctly opposing viewpoints argon available. The issue at hand is and always has been about whether or not we, as a society, should presume to enforce a penalisation that by definition irrevocably extinguishes the existence of another autonomous human being. Is it a responsible and mature decision to implement a penalisation of much(prenominal) resounding finality merely because the convicted offender has been found to be blameable beyond a reasonable doubt? It has long been argued that an appropriate endpoint of i mprisonment should be the maximum available penalty for a knockdown-dragout offense. This argument has been supported by the fact that our legal system, though passing evolved and altogether expedient, is far from infallible, and in recognition of this the penalties imposed under it should be both reversible and humane. The imposition of the penalty of death should no long-life be exercised in the United States of America. A socially mature and virtuously established country should refrain from taking the lives of any of its citizens. The death penalty is indefensible on three distinct and specific grounds pragmatic, legal, and moral. The penalty of death is not economically efficient, and is indeed a drain upon the monetary resources of our country. Also, it can be proven that the death ... ...alty-share-lower.html Brennan, William. Concurring Opinion Furman v. Georgia. zero(prenominal) 69-5003 Supreme Court Of The United States 29 June 1972. Web. 20 may 2015. https//www .law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/ school textual matter/408/238 Linehan, Elizabeth A. Executing the Innocent. Web. 17 May 2015. https//www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Huma/HumaLine.htm Marshall, Thurgood. Concurring Opinion Furman v. Georgia. no 69-5003 Supreme Court Of The United States 29 June 1972 Web. 20 May 2015. https//www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/408/238 Prejean, Helen. Dead Man Walking. New York Vintage, 1994. Scheck, Barry, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer. Actual Innocence. New York Doubleday, 2000. Sherrill, Robert. expiry Trip The American Way Of Execution. Nation 8 Jan. 2000. Web. 26 May 2015. http//www.thenation.com/article/death-trip-american-way-execution