.

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Review of a few good men Essay

A few good men starring hole Nicholson Tom Cruise and Demi Moore is more or less ethic in the mari clock. M some(prenominal) characters in the movie argon faced with moral dillemas Tom Cruise and gob Nicholsons characters are faced with moral dillemas. The movie is about both marines who are accused of murdering there fellow officer, during the incestigation it is discove redness that there is a trust c alled code red this is a unethical and unofficial disciplinary streak by the marine squad when a member goes against the unit. The offender is gagged, beaten, and consequently they are killed by their fellow officers. The accused put the blame on someone they said was higher up from them. They carried out the code red crop because the officer was non living up to the duties and agenda of the marines, and they were spare-time activity the command of a higher ranking officer than they were. It is later observe that Colnel Jessup played by Jack Nicholson was the one who gave the order to kill hole-and-corner(a) capital of Chile.This crime is not yet ethically wrong in the marine corps but it is excessively illegal by law. Lance bodied Harold dawson and Private Louden Downey, played by Wolfgang Bodison and James Marshall were honour equal follo fuck off itg orders when they assulted Private Santiago late at night by stuffing a rag in his mouth and basically suffocative him creating respirtory complications. Santiago had decided that millitary life was not what he destinyed and he ended up paying the price for that decision. False discharge cover were created in an attempt to hide the actual code red plan. at that place are two ethical issues here, of course one is the murder performed byDawson and Downey, the separate is the code red order of Jessup and the subsequent cover up. Kaffe is a preteen trial lawyer who has a lot to prove. His father was a far-famed lawyer, so in order to be manage him Kaffe needs to win all the time , losing is n ot an option. One of his tactics is to request a plea bargain on more of his causal agents.Kaffee is acquired to defend Dawson and Downey, however Kaffee k nowadayss that the two marines aim done something unethical. Kaffee, in fact, despises Dawson and Downey so much that he says they do not deserve the uniforms that they wear. Kaffee has adilemma his personal feelings concerning people who abuse others who arent able to defend themselves get in the way. In short Kaffe does not want to defend these marines.His normal course of action would have been to request a plea bargain. However JoanneGalloway played by Demi Moore, his co-council and superior officer convinces him not to go that route.Kaffestarts work hard on the case. As time goes on he discovers that Dawson and Downey are really not to blame at all. The paradox rests squarely with Jessup. When this disco rattling is made Kaffe holds colonel Jessup culpable. This puts Kaffes name and career at great risk. over time it bec ame very important for Kaffee to vindicate the marines and to take away down Jessup. This in his mind was proper justice and also something true,noble, and away(p) of himself. He even came to accept that fulfilling his fathers footsteps did not matter.Most civilians would label Jessups actions as cruel and cold hearted and vicious. They would view the incident from a Teleological framework, which fashion they would be ringing about theconsequences of Jessups actions. However, civilians are not marines and and so do not down the stairsstand the point of the situation. The point is to adherence to armament rules. In fact proper ethical behavior in the case of a marine comes form following therules. This is an example of a deontological framework, or a framework that judges the ethics of an action based on adherence to rules. This is Jessup gestates to be the world he lives in, a world, iof rules, not consequences.The turn of events point in all of this occurred when Santiago died. Jessup lost his mind at this point. He lied to Kaffee by telling him that Santiago was to leave the base.He also said that his chiefs of staff had orders not to abuse Santiago. Because of Kaffee andGalloways persistance, Jessup went to prison house for his actions.I am not a array person, but have m any(prenominal) family and friends that are in the millitary and know how some of the operations and rules work..However, this kind of situation is not possible amongst civilians. Military people have to defend our soils freedoms and sometimes they have to fight for the freedoms of other countries.In order to do this they have to abide by a particular raise of rules so that they are fair in helping other countries have their safety and freedoms as well. I really do not conceptualize that the ethical dilemmas posed by the movie could have been solved any other way. Dawson and Downey may have rejected Jessups orders to do a code red on Santiago. They mayhave been fired for this, but in any event the order would have gone to other Marines more unforced to carry it out and help their career. It really does not matter because Santiago would experience thecode red no matter what. Fate is what it is andcannot be changed and in this case it was his time.Kaffee wanted a plea bargain, however due to Galloways influence he chose to focus his intellect on the case. I believe that this was a wise decision. It resulted in saving the marines from time in prison and sending Jessup to jail. .Code red orders have probably been given countless times in the past, the reason being that they work.People have a preconcieved judgment of what lawyers do, and how they call back and act. That they are only out to make a profit. This is a millitary court though they have to uphold to a different enured of standards when it comes to the law. There is the law that we know and the law of the millitary. I also think that people watch movies about legalities and justice to try a nd get a better understanding of our world. There are a few different types of millitary branches out there that rule different areas alike the navy is usually under water, the army is on land, and the airforce rules the skies. With all these how do we govern laws to fit all categories of the millitary. How do we ensure that they evenly enforce these laws and protect all of their enlisters. I read an article about women being assulted by their fellow officers and they hardley ever see and type of punishment or trial for what they did. How is there any ethics there. What lesson is learned, that since they are in the millitary they can get away with thing. To me I think that millitary should fall under the same circuit of justice as all others.I think that the movie all in all was very good. The actors that portrayed the characters were very believeable, as well as the story line. I think something like that could and maybe even already did happen. You hear a lot now about our soldiers falling victim to friendly fire over seas and it makes you love why that really happened. It is a sad reality though. I also like a lot of the actors in the movie like Kevin Bacon, Kieffer Sutherland as well as Jack Nicholson and Demi Moore. I think that with the upcoming holliday it was only fitting to do a movie about the millitary. Many of my family members either have served or still serve in the millitary and I was in the ROTC program in highschool so to me this is a subject thatI am passionate about. Not just on hollidays but prevalent I come across a veteran I make sure to thank them. Because wha happened in the movie does not depict the military as a whole and these men and women truly are the superheroes of today.

No comments:

Post a Comment