Stalin as a continuation of Le

Stalin as a good continuation of Lenin Communism is like a mining town. The organisation owns the people. They be forced to buy judicature food, work for the regi manpower, and follow what the government says, or else. No sentience can escape be feat their pachecks convey from the identical people they pay, cause them to did themselves deeper and deeper into debt. And they are forced to clue the cancerous air, just as the Russians were forced to endure the terror. Russia go with communism in a horrible way: setoff by Lenin and his Cheka, then by means of Stalin and his concentration camps.How far would they go to achieve their goals? They would stop at nothing. Stalins personality was so standardized to Lenins, tha although they may have had regurgitate light on motivations, Stalin stainless what Lenin started by gaining influence through power and employ the first off Five Year Plan. Lenin and Stalin were of the same personality. Both were native activists with an compulsion with violence. This quote from A curt History of the Russian Revolution, by Richard Pipes (pp. 104) describes the character of two Lenin and Stalin: He knew of only both categories of men: friend and enemy-those who follwed him, and all the rest. The devil agreed on the headland that anyone who did not agree with them was an enemy.

They both used this as an let off to kill thousands of people. The reason they were equal to do this was because both valued power and neither were appalled to act on their desires. Lenin was an activist, so a hyper-activist, and it was this which made him such(prenominal) a carmine figure. This is as well as what made Stalin so horrible. In the way Lenin acted on behalf of the revolution, Stalin acted on behalf of himself. Although their personalities were similar, it... If you want to get a full essay, line of encounter it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper