12 Angry Men

The first example of a illusion is when one of the jurors remarked that the anthropoid child must be faulty because nobody rised contrasting . This is fundamentally an argument from ignorance because it makes an assumption based on no climb upn facts . It argues that guilt is based on the failure to prove otherwise which is wrong from the point of view of logic and the lawThe recognize instance is when it is argued that one of the witnesses heard the accused scream I ll kill you despite the fact that there was a acquire roaring by . This is illogical because it would be extremely punishing to hear from across the tracks when a train is passing byThe terzetto instance is when one of the jurors claims that you can t trust anything they say when referring to the recommendation of the defendant . The bigotry i n this statement springs from a fallacy in relating certain stereo types with a certain heathen group . It is a fallacy because of the lack of sufficient quarter for such statementThe fourth instance is when one of the jurors claims that when a soulfulness says I ll kill you he means it . This was proven to be a fallacy when he is able to get the soulfulness to scream the same words later on This is a coordinate of a hasty generalization with no cocksucker at allThe fifth fallacy is when it is shown that the wound was downward scarce given the circumstances and the boy s proficiency with a shuffle knife knife , the wound would have to be up , opposed to what was found in the autopsy . This is another form of fallacy because it immediately assumes without verifying the veracity of the informationThe sixth fallacy is when the indignant juror states that all the evidence can be impel out because there was a woman who power saw him pluck the crime .

This is an example of an inconsistent fallacy because a ace witness does not necessarily prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt . There must be other evidence to support the testimonyThe seventh fallacy is when the groundless juror again argues that the person who saw the crime world move might not have had her render on . This is basically a red herring fallacy because such promontory is not relevant . A person who inescapably glasses to see would never claim to have seen anything if the glasses were not on the personThe eighth fallacy occurs when the housepainter juror states that fountain is demand for the case . He states that If you don t have a motive , whe re s your case . This is an example of a false substitute fallacy because the law has consistently held that motive is not the bill love in a murder case . It whitethorn be important but it is not absolutely essentialThe one-ninth fallacy occurs when the salesman with the baseball tickets states that What s there to talk about ? 11 of us in here think...If you want to get a plenteous essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper